Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi has questioned the Federal Government’s approach to tackling insecurity, asking why authorities have not pursued dialogue with Boko Haram insurgents and armed bandits in the same manner they engaged Niger Delta militants during the region’s years of unrest. According to the cleric, negotiations have previously played a role in reducing violence in parts of the country, and he believes a similar strategy deserves consideration in addressing the ongoing security challenges affecting several northern states.
Gumi argued that dialogue, rehabilitation, and reintegration should remain part of the government’s broader security strategy. He maintained that military operations alone may not be sufficient to bring lasting peace and suggested that creating opportunities for repentant fighters to lay down their arms could contribute to ending years of conflict. The cleric emphasized that his position is based on the desire to promote peace, reduce bloodshed, and encourage sustainable solutions to insecurity rather than to justify or support the activities of armed groups.
His comments have continued to generate public debate, with supporters arguing that dialogue has proven effective in resolving some conflicts, while critics insist that terrorist groups responsible for widespread killings, kidnappings, and destruction should be confronted primarily through law enforcement and military action. The Federal Government has consistently maintained that it remains committed to restoring security across the country through a combination of military operations, intelligence gathering, and other lawful measures aimed at protecting lives and property.